由 英语数字智库 了解更多考研英语：教育校园人文类词汇目录
美国国家公共电台精读篇目
短篇社会小品：第二十一篇
本文为原创纪实报道文稿
沿用美国国家公共电台严谨写实文风，内容独立撰写、无抄袭。
英文原文
Social media was originally designed to connect people
and bridge distance between friends, families and strangers.
It enables ordinary users to share daily moments,
express personal opinions and exchange diverse viewpoints online.
Yet as social platforms grow increasingly influential in public life,
a dark side of online communication has expanded rapidly.
Hostile comments, personal attacks and irrational verbal conflicts
have formed a widespread social phenomenon known as online toxicity.
Unlike face-to-face conversations regulated by social etiquette,
online interactions lack real-time restraint and moral supervision.
Users hide behind anonymous profiles and virtual screens,
which greatly lowers the cost of releasing negative emotions.
Many people who remain polite and calm in real life
easily turn aggressive, judgmental and extreme on social media.
Minor disagreements on trivial topics can quickly escalate.
A simple lifestyle choice, a different opinion or a single careless sentence
may trigger massive online criticism, mocking and personal accusations.
Online anger rarely targets specific mistakes or logical flaws.
Instead, it tends to attack personal character, identity and reputation,
ignoring context, facts and the complexity of real situations.
Journalists who track online public opinion have summarized a clear pattern.
Social media algorithms are designed to prioritize engaging content.
Strong emotions, especially anger, hatred and controversy,
generate far more clicks, shares and comments than rational discussions.
Platforms amplify extreme voices to boost traffic and user activity,
gradually distorting the overall atmosphere of online public discourse.
Ordinary individuals often become innocent victims of online hostility.
Public figures, celebrities and ordinary netizens alike
may encounter endless online abuse once they enter public view.
Many victims experience anxiety, sleep loss and severe mental pressure.
Some choose to stay silent, withdraw from social platforms,
and give up the right of public expression to avoid further harm.
This creates a chilling effect on the entire online community.
More people become afraid of speaking freely and sharing authentic ideas,
for fear of being misinterpreted, attacked or verbally bullied online.
Sociologists point out that online toxicity reflects real social anxiety.
Intense life pressure, fierce competition and fast-paced modern life
leave many people with accumulated negative feelings.
The internet becomes a convenient and unrestricted outlet
for frustration, resentment and long-term emotional suppression.
Anonymous online environments allow people to release stress violently,
without taking real-life responsibility for their rude words.
Nevertheless, online hostility brings no positive social value.
Blind criticism and personal attacks never solve actual social problems.
They only intensify group confrontation and emotional division,
worsening distrust between different groups of people in society.
In severe cases, uncontrolled online violence leads to real-life harm,
including public shaming, personal privacy leakage and extreme behavior.
In recent years, mainstream platforms have begun to adjust their rules.
They remove malicious comments, block abusive accounts,
and strengthen real-name verification and content censorship.
Psychologists suggest the solution goes beyond technical regulation.
True improvement requires better public media literacy.
Users need to learn rational judgment,
objective analysis and respectful dialogue,
rather than following emotional crowds and extreme public opinions.
A healthy online environment depends on every individual’s self-discipline.
The internet can empower communication,
unite communities and spread kindness.
But it will breed violence and chaos
if people let negative emotions override reason and empathy.
Online civilization is not only an internet requirement,
but also an essential part of modern social civilization.
译文
社交媒体最初的设计初衷，是拉近人与人的距离，
消弭朋友、家人乃至陌生人之间的空间隔阂。
它让普通用户能够分享日常点滴，
表达个人观点，在线交流多元看法。
但随着社交平台在公共生活中的影响力持续扩大，
网络交流的阴暗面也在快速蔓延。
恶意评论、人身攻击、非理性言语冲突，
形成了一种普遍的社会现象：网络戾气。
不同于受社会礼仪约束的线下面对面交流，
网络互动缺少实时约束与道德监督。
用户隐藏在匿名身份与虚拟屏幕背后，
极大降低了宣泄负面情绪的成本。
许多在现实生活中礼貌温和的普通人，
在网络上却极易变得激进、武断、观点极端。
细微的分歧，都能迅速发酵、不断升级。
一个普通的生活选择、一句不同的看法、一句无心的言论，
都可能引来铺天盖地的网络批判、嘲讽与人身指责。
网络戾气很少针对具体错误或逻辑漏洞展开讨论。
它往往直接攻击他人人品、身份与名誉，
完全无视前因后果、客观事实与现实的复杂性。
长期追踪网络舆论的记者总结出一条清晰规律。
社交媒体算法的核心逻辑，是优先推送高互动内容。
强烈的情绪，尤其是愤怒、对立与争议，
比理性讨论更容易产生点击、转发与评论。
平台为了流量活跃度，不断放大极端声音，
一步步扭曲整个网络公共讨论的氛围。
无数普通人，都曾沦为网络敌意的无辜受害者。
公众人物、网红名人、普通网民无一例外，
只要进入公众视野，就可能遭遇无休止的网络谩骂。
很多受害者因此焦虑失眠、承受巨大精神压力。
一部分人选择沉默退让、退出社交平台，
放弃公开表达的权利，只为避免持续伤害。
这给整个网络社区造成了寒蝉效应。
越来越多人不敢自由发声、不敢表达真实想法，
生怕被曲解、被围攻、遭受网络言语霸凌。
社会学者指出，网络戾气本质折射出现实社会的焦虑。
高强度的生活压力、激烈的社会竞争、快节奏的现代生活，
让很多人积攒了大量负面情绪。
互联网成为最便捷、几乎无约束的宣泄口，
释放积压的挫败、不满与长期压抑。
匿名的网络环境，让人肆无忌惮宣泄情绪，
无需为过激言论承担现实代价。
但网络戾气无法带来任何正向社会价值。
盲目指责与人身攻击，解决不了任何实际社会问题。
它只会加剧群体对立、加深社会情绪割裂，
让不同群体之间的不信任愈发严重。
情况严重时，失控的网络暴力会造成实质性现实伤害，
出现公开羞辱、隐私泄露甚至极端行为。
近年来，主流社交平台已经开始调整管理规则。
平台清理恶意评论、封禁谩骂账号，
强化实名审核与内容监管机制。
心理学家认为，解决问题不能只依靠技术管控。
真正的改善，需要全民媒介素养的提升。
用户需要学会理性判断、客观分析、尊重对话，
而非盲从情绪洪流、跟风极端舆论。
健康的网络环境，依靠每一个人的自我约束。
互联网本可以赋能沟通、凝聚社群、传递善意。
但如果人们任由情绪压倒理智、取代共情，
网络就会滋生暴力与混乱。
网络文明不是单纯的网络规则要求，
更是现代社会文明不可或缺的重要部分。
一、核心生词
1. original
/əˈrɪdʒənl/
最初的，原始的
形容词（adj.）
2. influential
/ˌɪnfluˈenʃl/
有影响力的
形容词（adj.）
3. toxicity
/tɒkˈsɪsəti/
戾气，有害性
名词（n.）
4. etiquette
/ˌetɪˈket/
礼仪，规矩
名词（n.）
5. anonymous
/əˈnɒnɪməs/
匿名的
形容词（adj.）
6. trivial
/ˈtrɪviəl/
琐碎的，微小的
形容词（adj.）
7. controversy
/ˈkɒntrəvɜːsi/
争议，争论
名词（n.）
8. amplify
/ˈæmplɪfaɪ/
放大，扩大
动词（v.）
9. discipline
/ˈdɪsəplɪn/
自律，约束
名词（n.）
10. empathy
/ˈempəθi/
共情，同理心
名词（n.）
二、重点短语
1. virtual screen
虚拟屏幕
2. online toxicity
网络戾气
3. social etiquette
社会礼仪
4. escalate conflict
激化矛盾
5. public discourse
公共舆论
6. chilling effect
寒蝉效应
7. media literacy
媒介素养
8. self-discipline
自我约束
三、长难句拆解
句子
Yet as social platforms grow increasingly influential in public life,
a dark side of online communication has expanded rapidly.
主干：
a dark side of online communication has expanded rapidly
时间状语从句：
Yet as social platforms grow increasingly influential in public life
主干译文：
网络交流的阴暗面正在快速蔓延。
从句译文：
随着社交平台在公共生活中的影响力持续扩大。
整句译文：
但随着社交平台在公共生活中的影响力持续扩大，
网络交流的阴暗面也在快速蔓延。
句子结构：
as引导时间状语从句 + 主句。
句子
Users hide behind anonymous profiles and virtual screens,
which greatly lowers the cost of releasing negative emotions.
主干：
Users hide behind anonymous profiles and virtual screens
非限制性定语从句：
which greatly lowers the cost of releasing negative emotions
译文：
用户隐藏在匿名身份与虚拟屏幕背后，
极大降低了宣泄负面情绪的成本。
句子结构：
主句 + which引导非限制性定语从句。
句子
Strong emotions, especially anger, hatred and controversy,
generate far more clicks,
shares and comments than rational discussions.
主干：
Strong emotions generate far more clicks, shares and comments
插入语：
especially anger, hatred and controversy
比较状语：
than rational discussions
译文：
强烈的情绪，尤其是愤怒、对立与争议，
比理性讨论更容易产生点击、转发与评论。
句子结构：
主谓宾主句，含插入语与than比较结构。
句子
Many victims experience anxiety,
sleep loss and severe mental pressure.
Some choose to stay silent,
withdraw from social platforms,
and give up the right of public expression to avoid further harm.
主干：
Many victims experience anxiety,
sleep loss and severe mental pressure
主干：
Some choose to stay silent,
withdraw from social platforms,
and give up the right of public expression
目的状语：
to avoid further harm
译文：
很多受害者因此焦虑失眠、承受巨大精神压力。
一部分人选择沉默退让、退出社交平台，
放弃公开表达的权利，只为避免持续伤害。
句子结构：
两句主谓宾陈述句，不定式作目的状语。
句子
True improvement requires better public media literacy.
Users need to learn rational judgment,
objective analysis and respectful dialogue,
rather than following emotional crowds and extreme public opinions.
主干：
True improvement requires better public media literacy
主干：
Users need to learn rational judgment,
objective analysis and respectful dialogue
对比状语：
rather than following emotional crowds and extreme public opinions
译文：
真正的改善，需要全民媒介素养的提升。
用户需要学会理性判断、客观分析、尊重对话，
而非盲从情绪洪流、跟风极端舆论。
句子结构：
两句简单主句，rather than引导对比状语。
©英语数字智库 版权所有
所有学习素材资料均为英语数字智库原创，禁止私自转载、
摘抄、复制、二次编辑、商用分发，任何侵权行为将依法追究责任。
请点击返回首页美国国家公共电台精选 32 篇目录